Epstein Secrets

lopment, 61,1859-1871. (Reprinted in J. DeLoache [Ed.], [1994]. Current readings in child development, 2nd ed., NY: Allyon & Bacon) Goodman, G. S., Levine, M., Melton, G. B., & Ogden, D. (1991). Craig vs. Maryland. Amicus Brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of the American Psychological Association

ue is key. Brown University Newsletter. Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Evaluation of children's testimony: Factors influencing the jury. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702-731 Goodman, G. S. (1994). Review of The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony. Child Developm

d Memories. In W. T. O'Donohue, Wm. & E. Levensky (Eds,) Handbook of Forensic Psychology. Boston: Academic Press (Amsterdam: Elsevier), p 555-577. Levine, L. J. & Loftus, E. F. (2004) Eyewitness testimony. In Spielberger, C.D. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. San Diego: Elsevier Science (USA) Loft

minal, 1988 Supplement. Kluwer Law Books, 1-37. Bell, B. & Loftus, E.F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1171-1192. Schooler, J.W., Foster, R.A., & Loftus, E.F. (1988). Some deleterious consequences of the act of recollection. Memory and Cognition

opment, 61, 1859-1871. (Reprinted in J. DeLoache [Ed.], [1994]. Current readings in child development, 2nd ed., NY: Allyon & Bacon) Goodman, G. S., Levine, M., Melton, G. B., & Ogden, D. (1991). Craig vs. Maryland. Amicus Brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of the American Psychological Association

ue is key. Brown University Newsletter. Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Evaluation of children's testimony: Factors influencing the jury. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702-732. Goodman, G. S. (1994). Review of The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony. Child Develop