Epstein Secrets

Wolfe that stands in 16 contradistinction to that which holds that it 17 does. Although, as I'll point out in a few 18 moments, one of -- Judge Shepherd in his 19 concurring opinion doesn't -- he doesn't rely on 20 that, on that theory. 21 Our position is that Olson vs. Johnson sets 22 forth t

6573 65 called (1) 59:10 14:19 15:1,2 18:18 23:21,25 charges (1) 60:1 33:14 35:2,11 36:17 38:1,1 coming (1) 55:6 camera (1) 24:2 26:10 Chester (3) 41:7,12,17 emitted (1) 35:18 36:12,14,20 2:3,6 6:10 42:6,13 43:12 43:24 Capital (11 38:17 39:20 circuit (4) 44:8,19,19,20 commenced (

r Plaintiffs-Appellants: JEFFREY A. LEON (with Jamie E. Weiss, Grant Lee, on the brief), Quantum Legal LLC, Highland Park, Illinois; Laurie Rubinow, Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP, Chester, Connecticut; Nathan C. Zipperian, Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. For D

with Jamie E. Weiss, Grant Lee, on the brief), Quantum Legal LLC, Highland Park, Illinois; Laurie Rubinow, Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP, Chester, Connecticut; Nathan C. Zipperian, Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. For Defendants-Appellees: KENNETH M. KLIEBARD

Wolfe that stands in 16 contradistinction to that which holds that it 17 does. Although, as I'll point out in a few 18 moments, one of -- Judge Shepherd in his 19 concurring opinion doesn't -- he doesn't rely on 20 that, on that theory. 21 Our position is that Olson vs. Johnson sets 22 forth t

3571 65 called (1) 59:10 14:19 15:1,2 18:18 23:21,25 charges (1) 60:1 33:14 35:2,11 36:17 38:1,1 coming (1) 55:6 camera (1) 24:2 26:10 Chester (3) 41:7,12,17 comitted (1) 35:18 36:12,14,20 2:3,6 6:10 42:6,13 43:12 43:24 Capital (1) 38:17 39:20 circuit (4) 44:8,19,19,20 commenced