Epstein Secrets

nvoluntarily dismissing the Trust's foreclosure complaint post-trial. The trial court entered final judgment against the Trust based exclusively on Appellees' expert witness who testified at trial that the Trust was not, and never had been, the holder of the subject note. We reverse because the trial cour

40,000. Orion Bank's loan was memorialized with a promissory note (the "Olsak Note"), and secured with a mortgage (the "Olsak Mortgage") encumbering Olsak's real property in Key West, Florida. After Olsak defaulted [".2] on the note and mortgage by failing to make a required installment payment, the T

merely legal conclusions of a party's expert. IV. Conclusion Because the record on appeal reflects that the trial court impermissibly relied upon Appellees' expert's legal conclusions, we reverse the trial court's final order involuntarily dismissing the Trust's claim, and remand for further proceedings

MICs. Interestingly, when Kahn was asked on cross-examination if an endorsed-in-blank note is a transferrable instrument, the trial court sustained Olsak's [** 6] objection that the question called for a legal conclusion. We are compelled to reverse the trial court's determination that the Trust lacke

nvoluntarily dismissing the Trust's foreclosure complaint post-trial. The trial court entered final judgment against the Trust based exclusively on Appellees' expert witness who testified at trial that the Trust was not, and never had been, the holder of the subject note. We reverse because the trial cour

40,000. Orion Bank's loan was memorialized with a promissory note (the "Olsak Note"), and secured with a mortgage (the "Olsak Mortgage") encumbering Olsak's real property in Key West, Florida. After Olsak defaulted [".2] on the note and mortgage by failing to make a required installment payment, the T