Epstein Secrets

too much money, however. From day zero I proposed to discount to 50 - 60 million =the fair price of the transaction just completed . including apan>Phaidon.. though this amount was already substantially les= than our agreed and negotiated formula. - I was never told that thisiO was out of range. in fac

l March=) ,I provided as you specifically requested a detailed step b= step execution plan and reviewed all documents that i was given access to.=( Phaidon was not forthcoming ) in or=er to make my many corrections . I was then told t=at =span>Alans involvement warranted a discount . Even in the best of

e a high=level tax partner. use your trading accounts as th=y remain a paramount requirement 16 months after i emailed you =re their importance. THe Phaid=n transaction papered and structured as contemplated D=ES NOT WORK , its as simple as that. DOES NOT !! = suggest again that you re-do bank loans.

t: FW: Licensing Agreement Hi team, Can you please let me =now how you think we should respond to Chris's questions about the i=tended use of the Phaidon name by the new art entity? Shall I =ell him that the agreement should assume that any type of use is possible? Will the new art entity be paying Ph

on name by the new art entity? Shall I =ell him that the agreement should assume that any type of use is possible? Will the new art entity be paying Phaidon f=r the license? How do we determine the licensing fee? Thanks for your input.=o:p> -Ada From: Hurtado, Christopher L [mailto Sent: Tuesday, Octo

ns: -&nb=p; To what extent=will the Phaidon name be used by Narrows as a brand to market art online, =n galleries or otherwise? -&nb=p; Will the Phaid=n name be used on displays, etc. for lending art to institutions? EFTA_R1_01776201 EFTA02593035 -&nb=p; -&nb=p; Best, Chris Will the Phaid=n

ample. - Though you and I have spent many many hours di=cussing the importance of attentive care and attention to =etails and mechanics. with regard Phaidon = was not shown one single document , not one.!! Brad wanted to=keep it private between he, and his so called " advisors " however as he was out of

l March=) ,I provided as you specifically requested a detailed step b= step execution plan and reviewed all documents that i was given access to.=( Phaidon was not forthcoming ) in or=er to make my many corrections . I was then told t=at =span>Alans involvement warranted a discount . Even in the best of

e a high=level tax partner. use your trading accounts as th=y remain a paramount requirement 16 months after i emailed you =re their importance. THe Phaid=n transaction papered and structured as contemplated D=ES NOT WORK , its as simple as that. DOES NOT !! = suggest again that you re-do bank loans.

From: Brad Wechsler ., > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 8:02 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Cc: Melanie Spinella Subject: Fw: Phaidon governance Fyi... Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: "Barry J. Cohen" </=iv> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:12:35 +0000 To: 'Brad Wechsl

te: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:12:35 +0000 To: 'Brad Wechslera; 'Ada Clapp'8<l> Subject: Phaidon governance I'm wondering if the trustees should run the Phaid=n and Art Partnership structures by our outside counsel, Irene Steiner at =kin. Would that make sense? It would pain me to slow things do=n, and I'm

il two years ago.. 1/ 3 /16 Fr=m day zero I proposed to discount to 50 - 60 million the fair4, price of the transaction just completed . including Phaidon.. though this amount was already substantially les= than our agreed and negotiated formula. - I was never told that thist was out of range. in fact

ll Marc= ) ,I provided as you specifically requested a detailed step b= step execution plan and reviewed all documents that i was given access to.=( Phaid=n was not forthcoming ) in order to make my many=corrections . I was then told that Alans involvement warranted a discount . Even in the best of l=