Epstein Secrets

Shea & Boyle LLP 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Re: Request for Information Relating to Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Glassman: I am the Assistant U.S. Attorney ("AUSA") who will be handling the request you discussed with AUSA for certain information relating to Jeffrey Ep

approval of the proper Department official in accordance with §§ 16.24 and 16.25 of this part." 28 C.F.R. § 16.22(a); see also United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951); 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq. The "proper official" in this case is Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for t

ments: 080320_Letter_re_Requestiorinformation_Relating_tojeffrey_Epstein.pdf; Atigust_2020_Document_Production_to_Glassman_re_Touhy_Request.pdf Mr. Glassman, Please find attached a letter responding to your Touhy request. Thank you, From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 12:33 AM To: Robert Gla

frey_Epstein.pdf; Atigust_2020_Document_Production_to_Glassman_re_Touhy_Request.pdf Mr. Glassman, Please find attached a letter responding to your Touhy request. Thank you, From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 12:33 AM To: Robert Glassman (ta Cc: Betts < E > Subject: Re: Request for Tang

1:05 +0000 Importance: High Attachments: 6 8 20 Ltr re Jane Doe Touhy_request.pdf Hi all, Will you be able to gather the responsive documents for Glassman's request, as with the request from Kaplan? Except for Item 8, this request seems fairly contained—and they have expressly cabined their request to

From: To: • Subject: FW: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. I :20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 03:51:05 +0000 Importance: High Attachments: 6 8

ything. I don't think there's any hard deadline on the request because we're not in court and they didn't send a subpoena. So the main constraint is Glassman's annoyance. I wrote him a brief note back last night, although I doubt that will keep him happy for very long. I try not to provide specific timeli

more specific sense of timing. Thanks! From: Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 1:38 PM To: Subject: RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Hey I apologize for the delay — our entire team has been absolutely swampe

; Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Importance: High Hi all, Will you be able to gather the responsive documents for Glassman's request, as with the request from Kaplan? Except for Item 8, this request seems fairly contained—and they have expressly cabined their request to

couple emails below, they consist mostly of FedEx invoices, plus another few docs, that EFTA00084175 need to be redacted for production based on a Touhy request. Would you be able to help out with that? If you could please send the redacted versions to us and to (copied here), we'll do a final revie

New York, New York 10007 July 2020 By Electronic Mail Robert Glassman, Esq. Re: Request for Information Relating to Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Glassman: I write in response to your letter dated June 8, 2020, seeking documents from the Department of Justice ("Dal") related to Jeffrey Epstein and pla

Indyke et aL, No. 20-cv-484 (S.D.N.Y.). Your request is governed by federal regulations, referred to as "Touhy regulations." See United States a reL Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). Pursuant to these regulations, the Acting United States Attorney has authorized DOJ to provide certain documents res