Epstein Secrets

referendum and intelligence agencies should produce an assessment of potential interference in the Brexit referendum." The Independent (UK) (7/21, Sengupta, 1.36M) reports the security and intelligence services "were particularly wary of being accused of interfering in the political process." As a resul

EFTA00135638 "We have not been provided with any post-referendum assessment of Russian attempts at interference." The Telegraph (UK) (7/21, Hope, Rayner, 956K) reports the committee's 55-page published report, titled simply 'Russia,' "was heavily redacted." A separate annex "was not withheld because

ndependent (UK) <https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/russia-report-boris-johnson-ulc- government-eu-referendum-putin-a9631066.html> (7/21, Sengupta, 1.36M) reports the security and intelligence services "were particularly wary of being accused of interfering in the political process." As a resul

." The Telegraph (UK) <https://www.telegraph.co.ukJpolitics/2020/07/21/russia-report-unpacked-moscows- influence-uk-became-new-normal/> (7/21, Hope, Rayner, 956K) reports the committee's 55-page published report, titled simply `Russia,' "was heavily redacted." A separate annex "was not withheld because

referendum and intelligence agencies should produce an assessment of potential interference in the Brexit referendum." The Independent (UK) (7/21, Sengupta, 1.36M) reports the security and intelligence services "were particularly wary of being accused of interfering in the political process." As a resu

report says, "We have not been provided with any post-referendum assessment of Russian attempts at interference." The Telegraph (UK) (7/21, Hope, Rayner, 956K) reports the committee's 55-page published report, titled simply 'Russia,' "was heavily redacted." A separate annex "was not withheld because

referendum and intelligence agencies should produce an assessment of potential interference in the Brexit referendum." The Independent (VS) (7/21, Sengupta, 1.36M) reports the security and intelligence services "were particularly wary of being accused of interfering in the political process." As a resu

report says, "We have not been provided with any post-referendum assessment of Russian attempts at interference." The Telegraph (UK) (7/21, Hope, Rayner, 956K) reports the committee's 55-page published report, titled simply `Russia,' "was heavily redacted." A separate annex "was not withheld because