Epstein Secrets

rder to show cause. IL LEGAL STANDARD The Court will hold an evidentiary Show Cause Hearing to consider civil contempt. Green Point Credit, LLC v. McLean (In re McLean), 794 F.3d 1313, 1323 (11th Cir. 2015). The Court shall provide the requisite due process protections by issuing this "show-cause orde

otion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court, to Penn it Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [D.E. 6326] (the "Motion for Order to Show Cause"), the Responses [D.E. 6351, 6355], and the Reply [D.E. 6358] th

he award directly serves the complainant rather than the public interest and (2) whether the contemnor may control the extent of the award."' In re McLean, 794 F. 3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2015) quoting In re Hardy, 97 F. 3d 1384, 1390 (11th Cir. 1996). Bankruptcy courts do not have inherent power to impose

Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Relief (DE 6323; re-docketed as DE 6326) and Bradley Edwards' Joinder in Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause (DE 6325)i. T

The Eleventh Circuit has recently reaffirmed that bankruptcy courts have authority to impose both civil and criminal contempt sanctions. See In re McLean, 794 F.3d 1313, 1323-24 (11th Cir. 2015). Indeed, the Eleventh Circuit has recently explained that "[c]ivil contempt power is inherent in bankruptc

reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to ■., ■., and Jane Doe's Joinder in Motion for Order to Show Cause and Motion for Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [DE 6353]. INTRODUCTION In their motion, the Victims sought sanctions against Fowler White and Epstein for illega