Epstein Secrets

me s=mply state that on October 5, 1991, I happened to hear part of a conversation among Judge=E2 now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Sena=or Alan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then 13-1, to recommend the co

one day after the full Senate indicated that he would be=confirmed. The conversation I happened to hear had to do w=th those charges brought by Anita Hill and ignored by the members of the committee, =oth Democratic and Republican. At that point in time I still thought this was a= appropriate response

let me simply state that on October 5, 1991, I happened to hear part of a conversation among Judge—now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Senator Alan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then 13-1, to recommend the conf

gs,” he said. Personally, I feel quite disappointed about that particular aspect of the testimony, but I have not the slightest regret over leaking Anita Hill’s affidavit, and I would gladly do it all over again. I certainly set a higher moral standard for myself than did the staffer for Senator John Danfort

not simply (or perhaps, not yet) about outcomes, but rather about expectations and what itâems okay to talk about and when. Women â€" 27 years after Anita Hill, 12 years after Tarana Burket™s Me Too, and one year into #MeToo â€" are refusing to stop speaking about their experiences, their perspectives, their

a sign of their unnatural tendencies; no accident that when he was asking to have her removed from Kavanaughâe™s confirmation hearings two weeks ago, Orrin Hatch referred to a protester yelling about health care as a âtœloudmouth.âe The best way to discredit threatening women is to capture them giving loud voi