Epstein Secrets

-80w4-KAM Document ≥ Entered L. .:LSD Docket 09/05/2L J Page 6 of 14 CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRABOHNSON actionable underlying tort or wrong."' Posner'. Essex Ins. Co., 178 F.3d 1209, 1217-18 (11th Cir. 1999) (quoting Florida Fern Growers Assn'. Concerned Citizens, 616 So. 2d 562, 565 (Fla. 5th DC

TA00175544 Case 9:08-cv-80ou4-KAM Document "L . Entered L. FLED Docket 09/05/i...d Page 3 of 14 CASE NO.: 08-80804-CrV-MARRA/JOHNSON cite. See Mitchell'. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 294 F.3d 1309, 1314 (11th Cir. 2002) (noting as an undisputed point that someone retains their pre-incarceration

on may be ordered detained.... 18 U.S.C. § 3148 (repealed). As the Sev- Ic th Circuit stated recently in United States Molt, 758 F.2d 1198 (1985) (Posner, J.): T]he change in the standard for bail pending appeal is not an ex post facto law. Even though it may work to the disadvant- age p f of a de

on on its applicability would have been expressed by Congress. See generally Zannino, supra, at 56-57 l e Court recognizes that in United States Mitchell, 600 F.Supp. 164 .D.Ca1.1985) Judge Patel held that the Bail Reform Act of 1984 was inapplicable to defendants admitted to bail under the prio

Andriy Pazuniak, A Better Way to Stop Online Predators: Encouraging A More Appealing Approach to S 2422(b), 40 Seton Hall L. Rev. 691 (2010). Judge Posner of the Seventh Circuit has also warned that the statute's broad language and prohibition of attempts could lead, absent a limiting interpretation,

e Assistance of Counsel for his defense." 12 H. Mitchell Caldwell, The Prosecutor Prince: Misconduct, Acco

Andriy Pazuniak, A Better Way to Stop Online Predators: Encouraging A More Appealing Approach to S 2422(b), 40 Seton Hall L. Rev. 691 (2010). Judge Posner of the Seventh Circuit has also warned that the statute's broad language and prohibition of attempts could lead, absent a limiting interpretation,

e Assistance of Counsel for his defense." 12 H. Mitchell Caldwell, The Prosecutor Prince: Misconduct, Acco

4 The decision of the intermediate state court in Smith v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission, 30 Cal.

essional rejection of the idea. Cf. Ind. Prot. & Advocacy Servs. v. Ind. Family & Soc. Servs. Admin., 603 F.3d 365, 384-85 (7th Cir. 2010) (en banc) (Posner, J., concurring) (inferring a private right of action from statutory silence in a case where such silence was not the product of “legislative comprom