Epstein Secrets

vard and am in the process of closing down my lab. Thus, I'm afraid that I'm not the one you should be talking to. On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Isabel Maxwell wrote: Dear Jeff, Before 6am this morning, of a TG weekend, I was awakened out of a deep sleep to a most upsetting phone call between you and Al

r. Koch's sworn legal deposition about Al and literally place it in the top of his file, together with the legal ending of the McIver trial in which McIver is enjoined legally from uttering one more word about Al or he will go to jail. It's really very problematic as Al is not supposed to discuss the c

causing Al :-( EFTA00776733 And so it went on, with literally thousands of letters going out over 20 years, the use of the net, etc. In the end, Tom McIver agreed to pay all Al's lawyer fees and substantial compensation (Al is not allowed to release the amount he got), and McIver is to cease and desist

f al . Kosslyn has asked I, now in writing that al refrain from that claim Sony for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Nov 27, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Isabel Maxwell Dear Jeff, wrote: Before 6am this morning, of a TG weekend, I was awakened out of a deep sleep to a most upsetting phone call between you and Al

causing Al :-( EFTA00633149 And so it went on, with literally thousands of letters going out over 20 years, the use of the net, etc. In the end, Tom McIver agreed to pay all Al's lawyer fees and substantial compensation (Al is not allowed to release the amount he got), and McIver is to cease and desist

ing up his lies again, because if he did, he would go to jail. The case did not actually go to trial per se because Al's lawyers said it would close McIver down immediately and be less immediately expensive to us (We really had no more funds to pursue a court route as it would have 'ruined us' before w

ement is not. Today , i have had two people send me the lawsuit , and the mciver answers..I have not read them , d On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Isabel Maxwell Hi Jeff, wrote: I am not sure I understand your note. Who and what is "Christine affidavit? Are you perhaps, referring to the sworn affidavit tha

o and what is "Christine affidavit? Are you perhaps, referring to the sworn affidavit that "Christ& sent in his defense of Al some years back in the McIver case, in which he refers to this professor Kosslyn? Otherwise, I am confused. From what I am now understanding, from a letter sent by Kosslyn, he n

: Jeffrey [email protected] From: Isabel Maxwell Sent Sun 11/28/2010 1:52:28 AM Subject: Re: th

Chris and they were designing experiments together with eventual hope to publish a paper about it (and another post-doc in Shin's Lab too) when the McIver thing blew it all to bits :-( ) re Cal Tech, thanks for the advice, it's well taken but painful since he TRULY was formally and formerly (!) associ