Epstein Secrets

U.S. 168, 184 (1975)). A document is "predecisional" when it is "prepared in order to assist an agency decisionmaker in arriving at his decision." Grumman, 421 U.S. at 184. While a document is predecisional if it "precedes, in temporal sequence, the `decision' to which it relates," Grand Cent. P 'ship

t matter upon which professional advice is sought, and the confidentiality of the expression for which the protection is claimed." United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). "[T]he traditional rationale for the [attorney-client] privilege applies with special force in the government co

U.S. 168, 184 (1975)). A document is "predecisional" when it is "prepared in order to assist an agency decisionmaker in arriving at his decision." Grumman, 421 U.S. at 184. While a document is predecisional if it "precedes, in temporal sequence, the 'decision' to which it relates," Grand Cent. P'ship,

S. Dep 't of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (1982) 17 United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951) 16 United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1989) 14 W. Journalism Ctr. v. Office of Indep. Counsel, 926 F. Supp. 189 (D.D.C. 1996) 11 Williams v. F.B.I., 730 F.2d

U.S. 168, 184 (1975)). A document is "predecisional" when it is "prepared in order to assist an agency decisionmaker in arriving at his decision." Grumman, 421 U.S. at 184. While a document is predecisional if it "precedes, in temporal sequence, the 'decision' to which it relates," Grand Cent. P'ship,

S. Dep 't of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (1982) 17 United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951) 16 United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1989) 14 W. Journalism Ctr. v. Office of Indep. Counsel, 926 F. Supp. 189 (D.D.C. 1996) 11 Williams v. F.B.I., 730 F.2d

U.S. 168, 184 (1975)). A document is "predecisional" when it is "prepared in order to assist an agency decisionmaker in arriving at his decision." Grumman, 421 U.S. at 184. While a document is predecisional if it "precedes, in temporal sequence, the 'decision' to which it relates," Grand Cent. P'ship,

S. Dep 't of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (1982) 17 United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951) 16 United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1989) 14 W. Journalism Ctr. v. Office of Indep. Counsel, 926 F. Supp. 189 (D.D.C. 1996) 11 Williams v. F.B.I., 730 F.2d