Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: Mike Sitrick To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Follow up Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:06:16 +0000 Jeffrey I am in the midst of another client p
spirit of resoution, my understanding is that In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye you sought and received a currently unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it , your bil
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: Mike Sitrick < Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:31 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Follow up Sure From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tu
spirit of resoution, my understanding is that In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye you sought and received a currently unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it , your bill
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: Mike Sitrick Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:22 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Follow up Jeffrey I have had some time to check the facts. Your informati
spirit of resoution, my understanding is that In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye you sought and received a currently unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it , your bill
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 4:02 PM To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Re: Follow up not at all i sent an email to you on thurs, i resend Michael, Thanks for your time yesterday . to hopefully w=rk toward
spirit of resoution, my understanding is that =n response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye you sought and received a currently unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it , your bill
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: Mike Sitrick Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:43 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Follow up Off now From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: T
spirit of resoution, my understanding is that In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye you sought and received a currently unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it , your bill
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 4:44 PM To: Mike Sitrick Inbox <=iv class="" style> <https://ssIgstatic.com/ui/v1ficons/mail/profile_maskix.pn=> <=div> Darren Indyke 11:33 AM (56 minutes ago) <https:
reement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye on a settlement, yours filed a complaint=20 confidentiality obligations, which was never served on me, an
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (12)
Entities connected to both Mike Sitrick and LA County
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON82 w/ Mike·17 w/ LA
DI
Darren Indyke
PERSON10 w/ Mike·4 w/ LA
LA
Lance
PERSON7 w/ Mike·6 w/ LA
LB
Leon Black
PERSON7 w/ Mike·6 w/ LA
RB
Roy Black
PERSON7 w/ Mike·6 w/ LA
Lance Shinder
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Mike·5 w/ LA
Palo Alto
LOCATION4 w/ Mike·5 w/ LA
Sergey Brin
PERSON4 w/ Mike·4 w/ LA
Julie K. Brown
PERSON2 w/ Mike·6 w/ LA
Bill Clinton
PERSON5 w/ Mike·2 w/ LA
Michael Cohen
PERSON4 w/ Mike·3 w/ LA
Los Angeles Superior Court
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Mike·3 w/ LA