Epstein Secrets

Supreme Court had held almost uniformly that voluntary cessation [by a government defendant] moots the claim."' Bankshot Billiards, Inc. v. City of Ocala, 634 F.3d 1340, 1351 (11th Cir. 2011) (alteration by court; quoting Beta Upsilon Chi Upsilon Chapter v. Machen, 586 F.3d 908, 917 (11th Cir. 2009)).

suffered by the opposing party if the injunction issued; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. See North Am. Med. Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc., 522 F.3d 1211, 1217 (11th Cir. 2008).12 Because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, it is not to be granted until the

Supreme Court had held almost uniformly that voluntary cessation [by a government defendant] moots the claim."' Bankshot Billiards, Inc. v. City of Ocala, 634 F.3d 1340, 1351 (11th Cir. 2011) (alteration by court; quoting Beta Upsilon Chi Upsilon Chapter v. Machen, 586 F.3d 908, 917 (11th Cir. 2009)).

suffered by the opposing party if the injunction issued; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. See North Am. Med. Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc., 522 F.3d 1211, 1217 (11th Cir. 2008).12 Because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, it is not to be granted until the

Supreme Court had held almost uniformly that voluntary cessation [by a government defendant] moots the claim."' Bankshot Billiards, Inc. v. City of Ocala, 634 F.3d 1340, 1351 (11th Cir. 2011) (alteration by court; quoting Beta Upsilon Chi Upsilon Chapter v. Machen, 586 F.3d 908, 917 (11th Cir. 2009)).

suffered by the opposing party if the injunction issued; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. See North Am. Med. Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc., 522 F.3d 1211, 1217 (11th Cir. 2008),I2 Because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, it is not to be granted until the

Supreme Court had held almost uniformly that voluntary cessation [by a government defendant] moots the claim."' Bankshot Billiards, Inc. v. City of Ocala, 634 F.3d 1340, 1351 (11th Cir. 2011) (alteration by court; quoting Beta Upsilon Chi Upsilon Chapter v. Machen, 586 F.3d 908, 917 (11th Cir. 2009)).

suffered by the opposing party if the injunction issued; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. See North Am. Med. Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc., 522 F.3d 1211, 1217 (11th Cir. 2008).12 Because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, it is not to be granted until the