Epstein Secrets

2:31:21 +0000 r Hey I spoke to her today, so you're all good to send the letter, thanks very much — and the relevant people on the team there are Robbie, Kate Doniger, and Alexandra Conlon. Their emails, respectively, are: thanks again, From: (USANYS)1. Sent: Sunday, January 05, 202017:48 To: Su

are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to comply); Jacoby v. De!finer, 51 N.Y.S.2d 47

it. I'll send this out on Monday unless folks have any further changes. M , please let me know if I should hold off until you've checked in with Robbie. Thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2020 8:31 AM To: Cc: (USANYS) (USANYS) > Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requ

are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to comply); Jacoby v. Delfiner, 51 N.Y.S.2d 47

use a different address). assuming there are not huge changes to be made here, I think the letter/email could just go out as the next contact with Robbie on this, but I leave it up to you if/how you want to separately give her notice that it's on the way. Thanks, EFTA00094822 From: (USANYS) Sent:

are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to comply); Jacoby v. Deyiner, 51 N.Y.S.2d 478