Epstein Secrets

2:31:21 +0000 r Hey I spoke to her today, so you're all good to send the letter, thanks very much — and the relevant people on the team there are Robbie, Kate Doniger, and Alexandra Conlon. Their emails, respectively, are: thanks again, From: (USANYS)1. Sent: Sunday, January 05, 202017:48 To: Su

the files of criminal investigations is well-recognized. See In re Department of Investigation of the City of New York, 856 F.2d at 483; Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc., 738 F.2d 1336, 1341 (D.C. Cir. 1984); Kinoy v. Mitchell, 67 F.R.D. I, 11 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) (discussing privilege for files compiled in connect

it. I'll send this out on Monday unless folks have any further changes. M , please let me know if I should hold off until you've checked in with Robbie. Thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2020 8:31 AM To: Cc: (USANYS) (USANYS) > Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requ

the files of criminal investigations is well-recognized. See In re Department of Investigation of the City of New York, 856 F.2d at 483; Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc., 738 F.2d 1336, 1341 (D.C. Cir. 1984); Kinoy v. Mitchell, 67 F.R.D. I, I1 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) (discussing privilege for files compiled in connect

use a different address). assuming there are not huge changes to be made here, I think the letter/email could just go out as the next contact with Robbie on this, but I leave it up to you if/how you want to separately give her notice that it's on the way. Thanks, EFTA00094822 From: (USANYS) Sent:

the files of criminal investigations is well-recognized. See In re Department of Investigation of the City of New York, 856 F.2d at 483; Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc., 738 F.2d 1336, 1341 (D.C. Cir. 1984); Kinoy v. Mitchell, 67 F.R.D. I, 11 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) (discussing EFTA00094824 privilege for files comp