Epstein Secrets

r, on the following issues: (1) whether the lease unambiguously required that OFM's consent to an assignment or sublet be in writing, in which case Massey could not have orally consented, as a matter of law, to Epstein's sublet of the Premises to Fisher, (2) whether OFM was permitted under the lease to

ous unless it is reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, and the Court makes this determination by reference to the contract alone. Banque Arabe et Internationale d'Investissement v. Maryland Nat'I Bank, 57 F.3d 146, 152 (2d Cir.1995). The lease clearly provides that Epstein was required to obtain the advance written consent

er, on the following issues: (1) whether the lease unambiguously required that OFM's consent to an assignment or sublet be in writing, in which case Massey could not have orally consented, as a matter of law, to Epstein's sublet of the Premises to Fisher, (2) whether OFM was permitted under the lease to

ous unless it is reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, and the Court makes this determination by reference to the contract alone. Banque Arabe et Internationale d'Investissement v. Maryland Nat'l Bank, 57 F.3d 146, 152 (2d Cir.I995). The lease clearly provides that Epstein was required to obtain the advance written consent o

er, on the following issues: (1) whether the lease unambiguously required that OFM's consent to an assignment or sublet be in writing, in which case Massey could not have orally consented, as a matter of law, to Epstein's sublet of the Premises to Fisher, (2) whether OFM was permitted under the lease to

ous unless it is reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, and the Court makes this determination by reference to the contract alone. Banque Arabe et Internationale d'Investissement I Maryland Nat'l Bank, 57 F.3d 146, 152 (2d Cir.I995). The lease clearly provides that Epstein was required to obtain the advance written consent of