Epstein Secrets

on Of Premises The premises at issue in this lawsuit were the residence of a diplomat of the government of Iran (Declaration of Richard C. Massey ("Massey Dec."), Exh. A thereto). As such, they were recognized as consular property by the United States Department of State ("State Department"), Office o

known as 34 East 69th Street, New York, New York (the "premises"). On February 2, 1998, the Government requested that the subtenants of defendant Ivan S. Fisher, including Ms. Fisher and Ron Soffer, stipulate to the relief sought in this motion. Apparently, as of this writing, Ms. Fisher's counsel has not be

r, on the following issues: (1) whether the lease unambiguously required that OFM's consent to an assignment or sublet be in writing, in which case Massey could not have orally consented, as a matter of law, to Epstein's sublet of the Premises to Fisher, (2) whether OFM was permitted under the lease to

Orig. U.S. Govt. Works Not Reported in F.Supp. (Cite as: 1998 WL 159055 (S.D.N.Y.)) United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a the Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, Lawrence D. Gerzog, Robert Heilbrun, Su

on Of Premises The premises at issue in this lawsuit were the residence of a diplomat of the government of Iran (Declaration of Richard C. Massey ("Massey Dec."), Exh. A thereto). As such, they were recognized as consular property by the United States Department of State ("State Department"), Office of

4307, and "beneficial use" thereof. See id . § 4302(a)(4). Prior Proceeding& EFTA00204755 The Government originally named Jeffrey E. Epstein and Ivan S. Fisher as defendants (the "original defendants"), seeking equitable and monetary relief against them concerning their unpermitted uses of the premises. F2

er, on the following issues: (1) whether the lease unambiguously required that OFM's consent to an assignment or sublet be in writing, in which case Massey could not have orally consented, as a matter of law, to Epstein's sublet of the Premises to Fisher, (2) whether OFM was permitted under the lease to

Orig. U.S. Govt. Works Not Reported in F.Supp. (Cite as: 1998 WL 159055 (S.D.N.Y.)) United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a the Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, Lawrence D. Gerzog, Robert Heilbrun, Su

er, on the following issues: (1) whether the lease unambiguously required that OFM's consent to an assignment or sublet be in writing, in which case Massey could not have orally consented, as a matter of law, to Epstein's sublet of the Premises to Fisher, (2) whether OFM was permitted under the lease to

o Orig. U.S. Govt. Works Not Reported in F.Supp. (Cite as: 1998 WL 159055 (S.D.N.Y.)) United States of America, Plaintiff, I. Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a the Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, D. Gerzog, Robert Heilbrun, Suzanne Mc

on Of Premises The premises at issue in this lawsuit were the residence of a diplomat of the government of Iran (Declaration of Richard C. Massey ("Massey Dec."), Exh. A thereto). As such, they were recognized as consular property by the United States Department of State ("State Department"), Office of

7, and "beneficial use" thereof. See id . § 4302(a)(4). A. Prior Proceeding& EFTA00223063 The Government originally named Jeffrey E. Epstein and Ivan S. Fisher as defendants (the "original defendants"), seeking equitable and monetary relief against them concerning their unpermitted uses of the premises. F2