Epstein Secrets

er, on the following issues: (1) whether the lease unambiguously required that OFM's consent to an assignment or sublet be in writing, in which case Massey could not have orally consented, as a matter of law, to Epstein's sublet of the Premises to Fisher, (2) whether OFM was permitted under the lease to

t between some federal policy or interest and the use of state law" is required before "judicial creation of a special federal rule [is] justified." O'Melveny, 512 U.S. at 87. While few courts have addressed the precise issue of whether leases to which the Government is a party are governed by general fed

er, on the following issues: (1) whether the lease unambiguously required that OFM's consent to an assignment or sublet be in writing, in which case Massey could not have orally consented, as a matter of law, to Epstein's sublet of the Premises to Fisher, (2) whether OFM was permitted under the lease to

t between some federal policy or interest and the use of state law" is required before "judicial creation of a special federal rule [is] justified." O'Melveny, 512 U.S. at 87. While few courts have addressed the precise issue of whether leases to which the Government is a party are governed by general fed

on the following issues: (1) whether the lease unambiguously re- quired that OFM's consent to an assignment or sublet be in writing, in which case Massey could not have orally consented, as a matter of law, to Epstein's sublet of the Premises to Fisher, (2) whether OFM was permitted un- der the leas

etween some federal policy or inter- est and the use of state law" is required before "judicial creation of a special federal rule (is) justified." O'Melveny, 512 U.S. at 87, 114 S.Ct. 2048. While few courts have addressed the precise issue of whether leases to which the Government is a party are gover

r, on the following issues: (1) whether the lease unambiguously required that OFM's consent to an assignment or sublet be in writing, in which case Massey could not have orally consented, as a matter of law, to Epstein's sublet of the Premises to Fisher, (2) whether OFM was permitted under the lease to

between some federal policy or interest and the use of state law" is required before "judicial creation of a special federal rule [is] justified." O'Melveny, 512 U.S. at 87. While few courts have addressed the precise issue of whether leases to which the Government is a party are governed by general fede