Epstein Secrets

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

reporters, and attorneys from the United States Department of Justice. Consistent with the requirements of Brady v. Menyland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 438 (1995), as well as your own professional obligations, we request that the government conduct an affirmative search fo

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

reporters, and attorneys from the United States Department of Justice. Consistent with the requirements of Brady v. Menyland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 438 (1995), as well as your own professional obligations, we request that the government conduct an affirmative search fo

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

reporters, and attorneys from the United States Department of Justice. Consistent with the requirements of Brady v. Menyland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 438 (1995), as well as your own professional obligations, we request that the government conduct an affirmative search fo

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

reporters, and attorneys from the United States Department of Justice. Consistent with the requirements of Brady v. Menyland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 438 (1995), as well as your own professional obligations, we request that the government conduct an affirmative search fo

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

reporters, and attorneys from the United States Department of Justice. Consistent with the requirements of Brady v. Menyland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 438 (1995), as well as your own professional obligations, we request that the government conduct an affirmative search fo

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

reporters, and attorneys from the United States Department of Justice. Consistent with the requirements of Brady v. Menyland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 438 (1995), as well as your own professional obligations, we request that the government conduct an affirmative search fo

reporters, and attorneys from the United States Department of Justice. Consistent with the requirements of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 438 (1995), as well as your own professional obligations, we request that the government conduct an affirmative search fo

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl