Epstein Secrets

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

al communications between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, , David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14. We request

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl