Epstein Secrets

quests pursuant to Department of Justice regulations (known as Touhy regulations). See Christenson DecL ¶ 50; see also United States ex reL Touhy v. Roger:, 340 U.S. 462 (1951); 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq. As confidential communications between attorneys and a client for the purpose of obtaining and pro

overnment need only show that "disclosure of particular kinds of investigatory records .. . would generally interfere with enforcement proceedings." Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. at 236 (quotation marks omitted); Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). The 2 For the records withheld in full by B

hese categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exemption 5 i. Exempt

quests pursuant to Department of Justice regulations (known as Touhy regulations). See Christenson DecL ¶ 50; see also United States ex reL Touhy v. Roger:, 340 U.S. 462 (1951); 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq. As confidential communications between attorneys and a client for the purpose of obtaining and pro

overnment need only show that "disclosure of particular kinds of investigatory records .. . would generally interfere with enforcement proceedings." Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. at 236 (quotation marks omitted); Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). The 2 For the records withheld in full by B

hese categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exemption 5 i. Exempt

quests pursuant to Department of Justice regulations (known as Touhy regulations). See Christenson DecL ¶ 50; see also United States ex reL Touhy v. Roger:, 340 U.S. 462 (1951); 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq. As confidential communications between attorneys and a client for the purpose of obtaining and pro

overnment need only show that "disclosure of particular kinds of investigatory records .. . would generally interfere with enforcement proceedings." Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. at 236 (quotation marks omitted); Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). The 2 For the records withheld in full by B

hese categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exemption 5 i. Exempt