Epstein Secrets

ollusion with Russia that occurred during the 2016 campaign. Trump wrote, "The only Collusion with the Russians was with Crooked Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee...And, where's the Server that the DNC refused to give to the FBI? Where are the new Texts between Agent Lisa Page and her Agent lover, Peter S? We

ivkin, Casey: McCabe's 25th Amendment Claim Should Be Investigated. In an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal (2/24, Subscription Publication, 6.65M), David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. Casey, who served in the White House Counsel's Office and Justice Department under Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, argue that McC

it of the Poisonous Tree It makes no difference how honorable he 1s. His investigation 1s tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016. By David B. Rivkin Jr. and Elizabeth Price Foley June 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET 414 COMMENTS Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation may face a serious legal obstacl

orcing the notion that it was initiated “for the purpose” of affecting the presidential election. The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s servers. But nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative therefore hinges on the more generic

uit of the Poisonous Tree It makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation 1s tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016. By David B. Rivkin Jr. and HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026280 --- PAGE BREAK --- Elizabeth Price Foley June 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET 414 COMMENTS Special counsel Robert Mueller’s inv

orcing the notion that it was initiated “for the purpose” of affecting the presidential election. The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s servers. But nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative therefore hinges on the more generic

uit of the Poisonous Tree It makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation 1s tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016. By David B. Rivkin Jr. and Elizabeth Price Foley June 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET 414 COMMENTS Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation may face a serious legal obstacle:

orcing the notion that it was initiated “for the purpose” of affecting the presidential election. The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s servers. But nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative therefore hinges on the more generic

uit of the Poisonous Tree It makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation 1s tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016. By David B. Rivkin Jr. and Elizabeth Price Foley June 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026484 --- PAGE BREAK --- 14 COMMENTS Special counsel Robert Mueller’s inv

orcing the notion that it was initiated “for the purpose” of affecting the presidential election. The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s servers. But nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative therefore hinges on the more generic

26491 --- PAGE BREAK --- It makes no difference how honorable he 1s. His investigation 1s tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016. By David B. Rivkin Jr. and Elizabeth Price Foley June 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET 414 COMMENTS Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation may face a serious legal obstacl

orcing the notion that it was initiated “for the purpose” of affecting the presidential election. The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s servers. But nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative therefore hinges on the more generic