Epstein Secrets

A Week Benefit Expire. The Washington Post <https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/08/27/expired-unemployment-benefits- congress/> (8/27, Al , Rosenberg, Long, 14.2M) reports that Congress "split town in August after letting the $600-a-week unemployment bonus that millions of people...have been relyi

areas hard for rescuers to reach, the full casualty count remains to be seen." The AP <https://apnews.corn/45ba32bafe5da3465691544ecb3e5492> (8/27, Herbert, Deslatte, Plaisance) reports a "full assessment of the damage...was likely to take days, and the threat of additional damage loomed as new tornado

ed, $259 billion remains uncommitted. WPost: Unemployed Americans "Furious" Congress Let $600 A Week Benefit Expire. The Washington Post (8/27, Al, Rosenberg, Long, 14.2M) reports that Congress "split town in August after letting the $600-a-week unemployment bonus that millions of people...have been rely

"at least six people now confirmed dead, but with many areas hard for rescuers to reach, the full casualty count remains to be seen." The AP (8/27, Herbert, Deslatte, Plaisance) reports a "full assessment of the damage...was likely to take days, and the threat of additional damage loomed as new tornado

ed, $259 billion remains uncommitted. WPost: Unemployed Americans "Furious" Congress Let $600 A Week Benefit Expire. The Washington Post (8/27, Al, Rosenberg, Long, 14.2M) reports that Congress "split town in August after letting the $600-a-week unemployment bonus that millions of people...have been rely

"at least six people now confirmed dead, but with many areas hard for rescuers to reach, the full casualty count remains to be seen." The AP (8/27, Herbert, Deslatte, Plaisance) reports a "full assessment of the damage...was likely to take days, and the threat of additional damage loomed as new tornado

nbaum is neither a party to this lawsuit, nor an attorney of record, that discovery is closed and, in any event, no discovery is pending involving Rosenberg. Although styled a motion for protective order, Defendants rightfully point out that it is better understood as a motion for injunctive relief ag

ion that a document is automati- cally confidential if legal advice is sought or provided in the document is not %correct statement of the law. See Herbert'. Lan- do, 73 F.R.D. 381, 899 (S.D.N.Y.), remand- ed on other grounds, 668 F.2d 974 (2d Cir.1977), rev'd and remanded on other grounds, 441 U.S. 16