Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
9 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
ent's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has already addressed that motion. On November 15, 2021, the Government moved to fully or partially preclude the testimony
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
ent's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has already addressed that motion. On November 15, 2021, the Government moved to fully or partially preclude the testimony
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
ent's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has already addressed that motion. On November 15, 2021, the Government moved to fully or partially preclude the testimony
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
ent's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has already addressed that motion. On November 15, 2021, the Government moved to fully or partially preclude the testimony
2 mentions
Page EFTA00014701
ent's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has already addressed that motion. On November 15, 2021, the Government moved to fully or partially preclude the testimony
Page: EFTA00014701 →Page EFTA00014703
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
Page: EFTA00014703 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (225)
Entities connected to both Ulbricht and Loftus
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON28 w/ Ulbricht·43 w/ Loftus
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON20 w/ Ulbricht·34 w/ Loftus
United States
LOCATION23 w/ Ulbricht·26 w/ Loftus
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Ulbricht·32 w/ Loftus
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON9 w/ Ulbricht·32 w/ Loftus
Prince Andrew
PERSON12 w/ Ulbricht·28 w/ Loftus
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION15 w/ Ulbricht·24 w/ Loftus
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Ulbricht·30 w/ Loftus
Stephen Hawking
PERSON8 w/ Ulbricht·26 w/ Loftus
Julie K. Brown
PERSON10 w/ Ulbricht·24 w/ Loftus
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON8 w/ Ulbricht·26 w/ Loftus
George Mitchell
PERSON10 w/ Ulbricht·23 w/ Loftus
Donald Trump
PERSON5 w/ Ulbricht·27 w/ Loftus
Paul Ryan
PERSON8 w/ Ulbricht·24 w/ Loftus
Colorado
LOCATION6 w/ Ulbricht·26 w/ Loftus
LB
Leon Black
PERSON4 w/ Ulbricht·26 w/ Loftus
Mitch McConnell
PERSON5 w/ Ulbricht·25 w/ Loftus
Minnesota
LOCATION6 w/ Ulbricht·24 w/ Loftus
Joe Biden
PERSON5 w/ Ulbricht·25 w/ Loftus
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON3 w/ Ulbricht·26 w/ Loftus