Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mpared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible that the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via Templeton support to become even more so via Epstein-related sponsorship of prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable in view of their
From: "Charles L. Harper Jr." < To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re-send of key update Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:03:44 +0000 Hi Jeffrey, Let me know if/
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mpared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible that the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via Templeton support to become even more so via Epstein-related sponsorship of prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable in view of their
From: "Charles L. Harper Jr." < To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re-send of key update Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:49:14 +0000 Hi Jeffrey, Let me know if/
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mpared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible that the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via Templeton support to become even more so via Epstein-related sponsorship of prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable in view of thei
To: Jeffrey Epsteinfjeevacationagmail.comj From: Charles L. Harper Jr. Sent Sun 7/11/2010 1:48:32 PM Subject: Re: Hi Jeffrey, Your note from yesterday asked "next step?" The last time we spoke, you had suggested th
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mpared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible that the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via Templeton support to become even more so via Epstein-related sponsorship of prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable in view of their
To: Jeffrey Epsteinfjeevacationagmail.comj From: Charles L. Harper Jr. Sent Sat 5/29/2010 12:16:02 PM Subject: Fwd: Re: From: "Charles L. Harper Jr. Date: May 29, 2010 8:12:19 AM EDT To: Jeffrey Epstein jeevacation
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mpared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible that the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via Templeton support to become even more so via Epstein- related sponsorship of prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable in view of thei
To: Jeffrey Epsteinfleeyacationagmail.comj From: Charles L. Harper Jr. Sent Sat 5/29/2010 12:12:19 PM Subject: Re: hi Jeffrey, Great to hear from you. I was just up at MIT this week and met with Seth Lloyd (on Wedne
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (14)
Entities connected to both Templeton and Charles L. Harper Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON113 w/ Templeton·56 w/ Charles
Prince Charles
PERSON14 w/ Templeton·57 w/ Charles
Lawrence Krauss
PERSON29 w/ Templeton·3 w/ Charles
Marc Rich
PERSON19 w/ Templeton·7 w/ Charles
Philadelphia
LOCATION3 w/ Templeton·16 w/ Charles
CH
Charles Harper
PERSON3 w/ Templeton·14 w/ Charles
Max Tegmark
PERSON5 w/ Templeton·7 w/ Charles
Scott Aaronson
PERSON5 w/ Templeton·6 w/ Charles
Seth Lloyd
PERSON5 w/ Templeton·6 w/ Charles
BE
Becky
PERSON5 w/ Templeton·5 w/ Charles
CH
Chuck Harper
PERSON5 w/ Templeton·5 w/ Charles
Lesley Groff
PERSON8 w/ Templeton·2 w/ Charles
Astrophysics
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Templeton·5 w/ Charles
JB
James Billington
PERSON4 w/ Templeton·4 w/ Charles