Epstein Secrets

971, 974 (Fla. 1987); Ivey v. Chicago Ins. Co., 410 So. 2d 494, 497 (Fla. 1982). Each District Court of Appeal also uses staff analyses. See, e.g., B.B. v. M, 933 So. 2d 57, 65 n.8 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Burke v. Esposito, 972 So. 2d 1024, 1027-28 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); State v. Calderon, 951 So. 2d 103

reate ambiguity or generate differing reasonable constructions.' " (quoting Nettles v. State, 850 So. 2d 487, 494 (Fla. 2003) (emphasis supplied)); Wallace v. State, 860 So. 2d 494, 497-98 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ("Application of [the] rule [of lenity] means that if there is a reasonable construction of a

APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., E.W., and B.B., Respondents. Pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Case Nos. 2006 CF 9454AMB, 2008 CF 938 1 AMB PALM

Const., comes into play only when federal law clearly requires the records to be closed, and the state is clearly subject to its provisions. E.Q., Wallace v. Guzman, 687 So. 2d 1351, 1353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (exemptions to federal Freedom of Information Act do not apply to state agencies); Nous. Auth.

PPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 41)09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, VS. STATE OF FLORIDA, PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., E.W., and B.B., Respondents. Pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Case Nos. 2006 CF 9454AMB, 2008 CF 9381AMB PALM BE

Const., comes into play only when federal law clearly requires the records to be closed, and the state is clearly subject to its provisions. E.g., Wallace,. Guzman, 687 So. 2d 1351, 1353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (exemptions to federal Freedom of Information Act do not apply to state agencies); Hous. Auth. o