Epstein Secrets

enc= Krauss [mailto Sent: Friday,=February 23, 2018 4:19 PM To: Naimah =aadiq mailto- Jewett Cc: A am =aldman <mailto >; =awrence raus <mailto Cynthia 3 EFTA_R1_01657478 EFTA02520609 Subject: Private=and Confidential, in response to our meeting. Dear Naimah et al: =nbsp; Attached you will fin

eted its fact =athering. Our courts recognize that participants in an =dministrative investigation have a privilege against a defamation =harge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 =riz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized =hat the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed

rsity, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 7 EFTA_R1_01657540 EFTA02520655 Research =ff ice: ctel:( Assistant (Jessica) <tel lg=ns Office (Cynthia <tel mailto origins.asu.edu< => <https://urIdefense.proofpoint.com/v2/urI?u=http- 3A_orig=ns.asu.edu_&d=DQMFAg&c=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZF

Times=New Roman",serif'> Our courts recognize that participants in=an administrative investigation have a privilege against a defamation char=e. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Di=. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a =otice of charge of discrimination filed

ration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, =Z 85287-1404 Research Offic Assistant (Jessica): Origins Office (Cynthia) mailto origins.asu.edu I twitter.comAkraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.edu -Origins Project 10 =ear Celebration- Be a part of something 10 years in th

eted its fact =athering. Our courts recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a =rivilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 14= Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed

Research Office ssistant (Jessica) tel: =span class="" style=4"toriphans: 2. widows: 2; background-color: r ba(255 =255 255, 0);">Origins Office (Cynthia): e /div> =rigins.asu.edu <http://origins.asu.edu/> I twitter.com/Ikraussl <http://twitter.com/Ikraussl> I krauss.faculty.asu.edu <http://krauss.=

_01657604 EFTA02520709 Our courts recognize that participants in an adm=nistrative investigation have a privilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz.=335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the emp=oyer's response to a notice of charge of discrimination filed

d Physics Department Arizona Sta=e ni r i P. . ox 871404 Tem AZ 85287.1404 Research =ffic tel: j Assistant (Jessica): <tel, i trig=ns Office (Cynthia) tel: <mailto origins.asu.edu I twitter.comilkrausslgspan> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?wht=p- 3A_twitter.comikraussl&d=DQMFAg&c=AGbY

657719 EFTA02520780 * Our courts recog=ize that participants in an administrative investigation have a privilege =gainst a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz. 335= 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employ=r's response to a notice of charge of discrimination filed

dam Waldman mailt >; Erin El=ison - Ill • I - - • Cc: Lawrence Krauss Subject: Fwd: Private and Confidential, in respons= to our meeting. Dear Cynthia et al:=/u> Adam forwarded me your note while on a plane.=nbsp; I wanted to let you know that you can feel free to cc me on all commu=ication or ema

fact gatherin=. <=span> Our cour=s recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a pri=ilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 1=0 Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that=the employer's response to a notice of charge of discrimination fil=d

ploration and Physics =epartment Arizona State =niversity, P.O. Box =7 = 287-1404 Research Office: <tel: , Assistant =Jessica): Origins Office =Cynthia): <tel <mailto > =nbsp; EFTA_R1_01658871 EFTA02521591 origins.asu.edu <http://origins.asu.edu/> I twitter.com/Ikrauss1 krauss.faculty.asu.edu

eted its fact =athering. Our courts recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a =rivilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed