Epstein Secrets

y, and, as shown by Attachment E to the Black Affidavit, Epstein was receiving professional chiropractic services from a licensed chiropractor, Dr. Thomas Rofrano. Epstein's counsel misstates the state charges pending against his client. The state grand jury returned a three-count indictment. Each count charg

tes in evaluating that claim, but Epstein has objected to the production of those documents. F.I 1Although unpublished, the case of United States v. Hunter , 1995 WL 12513 (N.D. III. Jan. 6, 1995), contains facts similar to the ones at bar and gives a detailed analysis of the applicability of the attorn

y, and, as shown by Attachment E to the Black Affidavit, Epstein was receiving professional chiropractic services from a licensed chiropractor, Dr. Thomas Rofrano. Epstein's counsel misstates the state charges pending against his client. The state grand jury returned a three-count indictment. Each count charg

tates in evaluating that claim, but Epstein has objected to the production of those documents. F.I 1Although unpublished, the case of United States' Hunter , 1995 WL 12513 (N.D. III. Jan. 6, 1995), contains facts similar to the ones at bar and gives a detailed analysis of the applicability of the attorn

l records including treatment notes of Mr. Epstein's treatment by a chiropractor (see Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, dated March 13, 2007, to Dr. Thomas Rofrano annexed as Exhibit "E"), and now, invasion of the defense camp by seeking records of the investigative work performed by Mr. Riley on behalf of you

ference must have specified -the purpose for which the computers were seized and delineated the limits of their subsequent search". United States v. Hunter, 13 F.Supp.2d 574, 584 (D.Vt. 1998) Given these principles, the Requests contained in ¶'s 1 and 2 of the subpoenas are clearly unreasonable, since