Epstein Secrets

gically and plausibly explains the relationship between the documents and those pending criminal cases. Plaintiff also relies on a decision by Judge Torres in Noel, but this decision and subsequent proceedings in that case cut against plaintiff's position. The Government has already disclosed to the No

New York Times Co. v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Space Admin., 782 F. Supp. 628 (D.D.C. 1991) 12 NYCLU v. DNS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) 19 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 6 Summers v. DOJ, No. CV 98-1837(RWR), 2004 WL 7333532 (D.D.C. Apr. 14, 2004) 14 iii EFTA00071587

ey had not done so. (The focus of those prosecutions is on the false certifications they are alleged to have signed.) A June 9, 2020 order by Judge Torres, denying Thomas's motion to compel "disclosure of `reports generated by 7 The Government's vague allegations of the impact of disclosure on juror te

214, 227 (1978) 9, 10 NRDC v. EPA, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124353 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2019) 20 Pratt v. Webster, 673 F.2d 408 (D.C. Cir. 1982) 9 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 10 United States v. Noel, No. 19-CR-00830-AT (S.D.N.Y. June 9, 2020) 13 U.S. Dep't of Justice v. Ta

gically and plausibly explains the relationship between the documents and those pending criminal cases. Plaintiff also relies on a decision by Judge Torres in Noel, but this decision and subsequent proceedings in that case cut against plaintiff's position. The Government has already disclosed to the No

New York Times Co. v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Space Admin., 782 F. Supp. 628 (D.D.C. 1991) 12 NYCLU v. DNS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) 19 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 6 Summers v. DOJ, No. CV 98-1837(RWR), 2004 WL 7333532 (D.D.C. Apr. 14, 2004) 14 iii EFTA00088608

ey had not done so. (The focus of those prosecutions is on the false certifications they are alleged to have signed.) A June 9, 2020 order by Judge Torres, denying Thomas's motion to compel "disclosure of `reports generated by 7 The Government's vague allegations of the impact of disclosure on juror te

214, 227 (1978) 9, 10 NRDC v. EPA, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124353 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2019) 20 Pratt v. Webster, 673 F.2d 408 (D.C. Cir. 1982) 9 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 10 United States v. Noel, No. 19-CR-00830-AT (S.D.N.Y. June 9, 2020) 13 U.S. Dep't of Justice v. Ta

gically and plausibly explains the relationship between the documents and those pending criminal cases. Plaintiff also relies on a decision by Judge Torres in Noel, but this decision and subsequent proceedings in that case cut against plaintiff's position. The Government has already disclosed to the No

New York Times Co. v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Space Admin., 782 F. Supp. 628 (D.D.C. 1991) 12 NYCLU v. DNS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) 19 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 6 Summers v. DOJ, No. CV 98-1837(RWR), 2004 WL 7333532 (D.D.C. Apr. 14, 2004) 14 iii EFTA00099601