Epstein Secrets

ported on by CBS News (07/21, Montoya-Galvez), the Texas Tribune (07/21, Schneid), Forbes (07/21, Bohannon), the Dallas Morning News (07/21, Gilman, Torres), Axios (07/21, Medoza), The Hill (07/21, Bernal), a second The Hill (07/21, Suter) article, HuffPost (07/21, Nicholson), New York Post (07/22, Cra

nment "manufactured child pornography and planted it on a computer hard drive to tie it to him," according to court papers. The article stated that Raniere's lawyers also said the feds "falsified, fabricated, and manipulated all the key evidence it used" to convict him of child exploitation and child po

roves the FBI planted evidence on his computer. The article added that in a response filed Friday in Brooklyn federal court, prosecutors wrote that Raniere's third attempt at securing a new trial — like his first two — was "entirely without merit," adding that the motion should be denied as "untimely, u

ey evidence it used" to convict him of child exploitation and child porn. Prosecutors, in the Friday filing, detailed the evidence the FBI found in Raniere's Halfmoon, NY, residence — including nude photos of his first sex slave, Camila, who was around 15 years old at the time. Robbers Posing as FBI Ag

ng twin tracks: the trade of drugs and extorted commissary items inside the walls, and the exchange of money on the outside. The article stated that Torres took sole control over the jails after Mexican Mafia member, Armando "Perico" Ochoa, a high-ranking member of the MS-13 gang was sent to prison, th

d be denied since it is 'untimely, unfounded, legally unsupported, and contrary to the evidence adduced at trial'. The article mentioned that it is Raniere's third attempt to get a new trial since he was sentenced to 120 years in prison after he was convicted in 2019 of all charges of sex trafficking, f

was planted by the FBI as he hopes to get a new trial for the sex trafficking crimes he is currently serving 120 years for. The article stated that Raniere said he could prove that the evidence against him was planted, but prosecutors shut down his latest attempt to get a new trial, saying it was 'entir

eral Evidence § 702.02 [2] (2d ed. 2006)). Finally, even if the expert testimony is reliable, it must also be relevant. See, e.g., United States v. Torres, No. 20 Cr. 608 (DLC), 2021 WL 1947503, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. May 13, 2021). In this context, the testimony must "concern matters that the average juror i

terature and her clinical experience treating hundreds of trauma and abuse patients over the past twenty years." 9 EFTA00088811 United States v. Raniere, No. 18 Cr. 204 (NGG), 2019 WL 2212639, at *7 (E.D.N.Y. May 22, 2019). Instead, the defendant suggests that Dr. opinions are unreliable, irrelevan