Epstein Secrets

gically and plausibly explains the relationship between the documents and those pending criminal cases. Plaintiff also relies on a decision by Judge Torres in Noel, but this decision and subsequent proceedings in that case cut against plaintiff's position. The Government has already disclosed to the No

OIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") properly withheld these records, and plaintiff's arguments to the contrary ignore or mischaracterize the weighty law enforcement interests a

gically and plausibly explains the relationship between the documents and those pending criminal cases. Plaintiff also relies on a decision by Judge Torres in Noel, but this decision and subsequent proceedings in that case cut against plaintiff's position. The Government has already disclosed to the No

OIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") properly withheld these records, and plaintiff's arguments to the contrary ignore or mischaracterize the weighty law enforcement interests a

gically and plausibly explains the relationship between the documents and those pending criminal cases. Plaintiff also relies on a decision by Judge Torres in Noel, but this decision and subsequent proceedings in that case cut against plaintiff's position. The Government has already disclosed to the No

OIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") properly withheld these records, and plaintiff's arguments to the contrary ignore or mischaracterize the weighty law enforcement interests a