Epstein Secrets

t among the defendants.'" Am. Arbitration Ass'n, Inc. v. DeFonseca, No. 93 Civ. 2424(CSH), 1996 WL 36312S, at •7 (S.D.N.Y. June 28, 1996) (quoting Hecht v. Commerce Clearing House, 897 F2d 21, 26 n. 4 (2d Cir.1990)); see also Schmidt v. Fleet Bank, 16 F.Supp2d 340, 354 (S.D.N.Y.1998) ("Bare and co

d- dox, Gray Cary Ware and Friedenrich LLP (DC), Mitchell Rand Berger, Ronald Stanley Liebman, Patton Bogg

lso embraces the ground of the lack of standing to sue, and this statute is, therefore, available to support a motion to dismiss on this ground (see Hecht v Andover Assocs. Mgt. Corp., 2014 NY Slip Op 0063, *2 (2d Dept 2014]). Burns, in arguing that plaintiffs lack standing to sue, relies upon the thi

ez also had several $10,000 contributors: Lee Roy Mitchell of Dallas, founder of Cinemark Theaters; Eloisa

slamic Jihad pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1605(@)\()); Smith v. Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, 262 F.Supp.2d

ment among the defendants.’” Am. Arbitration Ass’n, Inc. v. DeFonseca, No. 98 Civ. 2424(CSH), 1996 WL 363128, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. June 28, 1996) (quoting Hecht v. Commerce Clearing House, 897 F.2d 21, 26 n. 4 (2d Cir.1990)); see also Schmidt v. Fleet Bank, 16 F.Supp.2d 340, 354 (S.D.N.Y.1998) (“Bare and conc