Epstein Secrets

A case that the CIA had no authority and therefore no discretion to open U.S. first class mail departing for and arriving from the Soviet Union); Glickman v. United States, 626 F.Supp• 171, 175 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (finding in FTCA case that CIA agent's secret administra- tion of LSD to plaintiff was not di

ities through U.S. broker). In 2002, less than 2% of the securities NCB traded for its own account were issued by U.S. entities. Juco Decl. 1 15; Schenker, 2002 WL 1560788, at .3-5 (finding that a single bank account in the United States, constituting small fraction of defendant's total assets, is in

NCB Securities Inc., dissolved in Febru- ary 2001. Id. (citing Ex A of Juco Decl., the certified copy of the Certificate of Dis- solution); see also Schenker v. Assicura- zioni Generali, S.P.A, No. 98 Civ. 9186(MBM), 2002 WL 1560788, at • 4 (S.D.N.Y. July 15, 2002) (finding no per- sonal jurisdiction ov

HN J COON,MILES GARVY,ROBERT GELICKMAN,DONALD COOPER,J P POHLMANN,BURT

MESSING,JOAN WENZEL CARLINO,MARY J SCHEINER,DINA O'KAIN,DEBORAH L STEPHENSON,GA

FTCA case that the CIA had no authority and therefore no discretion to open U.S. first class mail departing for and arriving from the Soviet Union); Glickman v. United States, 626 F.Supp. 171, 175 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (finding in FTCA ease that CIA agent’s secret administra- tion of LSD to plaintiff was not disc

SNCB Securities Inc., dissolved in Febru- ary 2001. Jd. (citing Ex. A of Juco Decl. the certified copy of the Certificate of Dis- solution); see also Schenker v. Assicura- ziont Generali, S.P.A, No. 98 Civ. 9186(MBM), 2002 WL 1560788, at * 4 (S.D.N.Y. July 15, 2002) (finding no per- sonal jurisdiction over

securities through U.S. broker). In 2002, less than 2% of the securities NCB traded for its own account were issued by U.S. entities. Juco Decl. 915; Schenker, 2002 WL 1560788, at *3-5 (finding that a single bank account in the United States, constituting small fraction of defendant’s total assets, is insuf