Epstein Secrets

return for services rendered" rather than "out of affection, respect, admiration, charity or like impulses." Id. at 285, 80 S.Ct. at 1197 (quoting Robertson v. United States, 343 U.S. 711, 714, 72 S.Ct. 994, 996, 96 L.Ed. 1237 (1952)). 42 Viewed in this light, I suggest that the bulk of the tax court ca

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: "Dr. Henry Jarecki" Subject: Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:59:57 +0000 I am troubled, however, by the path the majority takes to reach this result, and thus concur only i

return for services rendered" rather than "out of affection, respect, admiration, charity or like impulses." Id. at 285, 80 S.Ct. at 1197 (quoting Robertson v. United States, 343 U.S. 711, 714, 72 S.Ct. 994, 996, 96 L.Ed. 1237 (1952)). 42 Viewed in this light, I suggest that the bulk of the tax court c

From: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]> To: "Dr. Henry Jarecki" Subject: Re: Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:40:16 +0000 your call„ its just funny On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Dr. Henry Jarecki wrote: shou

return for services rendered" rather than "out of affection, respect, admiration, charity or like impulses." Id. at 285, 80 S.Ct. at 1197 (quoting Robertson v. United States, 343 U.S. 711, 714, 72 S.Ct. 994, 996, 96 L.Ed. 1237 (1952)). 42 Viewed in this light, I suggest that the bulk of the tax court ca

From: "Dr. Henry Jarecki" To: 'Jeffrey Epstein' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:16:51 +0000 should I pass this to wilens? From: Jeffrey E

n return for services rendered" rather than "out of affection, respect, admiration, charity or like impulses." Id. at 285, 80 S.Ct. at 1197 (quoting Robertson v. United States, 343 U.S. 711 714, 72 S.Ct. 994, 996, 96 L.Ed. 1237 (1952)). 42 Viewed in this light, I suggest that the bulk of the tax court ca

To: Jeffrey [email protected]] From: Dr. Henry Jarecki Sent Sat 9/12/2009 7:16:51 PM Subject RE: should I pass this to wilens? From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, Se