Epstein Secrets

Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous "carelessness" over expenses, and

they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State)... What they couldn't get, they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says, "In a criminal invest

stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin David- son. On March 9. Epstein said. he had met with Tarnow/ and Einbender again, and the two punnets told hint that the menthe com- mittee had weighed the offense. together with previous "carelessness- over expenses. and

what they knew they. could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger and unrelated pan of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State,. What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of HotTenberg says. "In a crim- inal inve

stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin David- son. On March 9. Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the tuo partners told him that the executive com- mittee had milted the offense. together with previous "careiessness" over expenses. an

ey knew they could get ... and that was the trauduient promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud. based in New York State].... What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says. "In a crim- inal in

n Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an “issue” of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous “carelessness” over expenses, and h

nder, but his probation would not be served under the strict requirements of sex offender probation. Jeffrey Epstein is a registered sex offender in New York State and Florida. Emily Michot E//[email protected] The judge didn’t question those provisions, but she did ask why Epstein was going to serve his sen

Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous "carelessness" over expenses, and

they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State)... What they couldn't get, they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says, "In a criminal inves

stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin David- son. On March 9. Epstein said. he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive com- mittee had weighed the offense. together with previous "carelessness" over expenses, a

ey knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e.. the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State].... What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with.- Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of HotTenberg says. "In a crim- inal in

nd unrelated part of Hoffenberg’s fraud, based in New York State].... What they couldn’t get, they didn’t bother w

n Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an “issue” of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous “carelessness” over expenses, and h