Epstein Secrets

According to Epstein, Bear Stearns management had questioned him about the loan around March 4. The questioners, Epstein said, were Michael (Mickey) Tarnopol and Alvin Einbender. In his 1989 deposition Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9

they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State)... What they couldn't get, they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says, "In a criminal invest

cording to Epstein. Bear Steams man- agement had questioned him about the loan around March 4. The questioners. Epstein said, were Michael (Mickey) Tarnopol and molten 2003 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE Alvin Einbentler.ln his 1989 deposition Ep- stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the

what they knew they. could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger and unrelated pan of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State,. What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of HotTenberg says. "In a crim- inal inve

tioned him about the loan around March 4. The questioners. Epstein Q: Sit are you a re t r • • an rumors may A: said,09(48/kfrkflmei (Mickey) Tarnopol and Q: ilat°pAlien ighiVitily9-ctistersa. been TANI_ Alvin Einbender. In his 1989 deposition Ep- stein recalled that the partner who had made a

ey knew they could get ... and that was the trauduient promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud. based in New York State].... What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says. "In a crim- inal in

According to Epstein, Bear Stearns management had questioned him about the loan around March 4. The questioners, Epstein said, were Michael (Mickey) Tarnopol and Alvin Einbender. In his 1989 deposition Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an “issue” of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9,

nder, but his probation would not be served under the strict requirements of sex offender probation. Jeffrey Epstein is a registered sex offender in New York State and Florida. Emily Michot E//[email protected] The judge didn’t question those provisions, but she did ask why Epstein was going to serve his sen

9 deposition Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous "carelessness" over

they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State)... What they couldn't get, they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says, "In a criminal inves

ording to Epstein, Bear Stearns man- agement had questioned him about the loan around March 4. The questioners, Epstein said, were Michael (Mickey) Tarnopol and u1.11r-u Inn, Alvin Einbender. In his 1989 deposition Ep- stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin Dav

ey knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e.. the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State].... What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with.- Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of HotTenberg says. "In a crim- inal in

nd unrelated part of Hoffenberg’s fraud, based in New York State].... What they couldn’t get, they didn’t bother w

989 deposition Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an “issue” of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous “carelessness” over e