Epstein Secrets

to the S.E.C. in 1981 and to lawyers in a 1989 deposition involving a civil business case in Philadelphia. In 1981 the S.E.C.'s Jonathan Harris and Robert Blackburn took Epstein's testimony and that of other Bear Stearns employees in part of what became a protracted case EFTA00204655 Page 7 The Talented Mr.

they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State)... What they couldn't get, they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says, "In a criminal invest

the S.E.C. in 1981 and to lawyers in a 1989 deposition involving a civil business case in Philadelphia. In 1981 the S.E.C.'s Jonathan Harris and Robert Blackburn took Epstein's testimony and that of other Bear Steams employees in part of what became a protracted case about insider trading around a tender of

what they knew they. could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger and unrelated pan of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State,. What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of HotTenberg says. "In a crim- inal inve

the S.F..C. in 1981 and to lawyers in a 1989 deposition invoh ing a civil business case in Philadelphia. In 1981 the S.E.C.'s Jonathan Harris and Robert Blackburn took Epstein's testimony and that of other Beat Steams employres in part of what became a protracted ease about insider trading around a tender of

ey knew they could get ... and that was the trauduient promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud. based in New York State].... What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says. "In a crim- inal in

to the S.E.C. in 1981 and to lawyers in a 1989 deposition involving a civil business case in Philadelphia. In 1981 the S.E.C.’s Jonathan Harris and Robert Blackburn took Epstein’s testimony and that of other Bear Stearns employees in part of what became a protracted case about insider trading around a tender offe

nder, but his probation would not be served under the strict requirements of sex offender probation. Jeffrey Epstein is a registered sex offender in New York State and Florida. Emily Michot E//[email protected] The judge didn’t question those provisions, but she did ask why Epstein was going to serve his sen

o the S.E.C. in 1981 and to lawyers in a 1989 deposition involving a civil business case in Philadelphia. In 1981 the S.E.C.'s Jonathan Harris and Robert Blackburn took Epstein's tes- timony and that of other Bear Stearns emicrWann part of what became a pro- tracted case about insider trading around a tender off

they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State)... What they couldn't get, they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says, "In a criminal inves

the S.E.C. in 1981 and to lawyers in a 1989 deposition involving a civil business case in Philadelphia. In 1981 the S.E.C.'s Jonathan Harris and Robert Blackburn took Epstein's testimony and that of other Bear Steams employees in part of what became a protracted case about insider trading around a tender of

ey knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e.. the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State].... What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with.- Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of HotTenberg says. "In a crim- inal in

nd unrelated part of Hoffenberg’s fraud, based in New York State].... What they couldn’t get, they didn’t bother w

to the S.E.C. in 1981 and to lawyers in a 1989 deposition involving a civil business case in Philadelphia. In 1981 the S.E.C.’s Jonathan Harris and Robert Blackburn took Epstein’s testimony and that of other Bear Stearns employees in part of what became a protracted case about insider trading around a tender offe