Epstein Secrets

suit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics Inc., filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, which Epstein put into oil. In 1984, Stroll asked for his money back; four years later he had received only $10,000. Stroll lost the s

tment from Stroll of $450,000, which Epstein put into oil. In 1984, Stroll asked for his money back; four years later he had received only $10,000. Stroll lost the suit, after Epstein claimed in court, among other things, that the check for 510,000 was for a horse he'd bought from Stroll. "My net worth

they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State)... What they couldn't get, they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says, "In a criminal invest

f Michael R. Stroll ("Stroll") seeks to recover from defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") money allegedly owed pursuant to a contract in which Stroll relinquished his interest in a joint venture. Epstein asserts that he executed the contract in a representative capacity, as an agent for the ven

s time-barred pursuant to N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 213(2) (McKinney 1990). which pro- vides • six.year statute of limitations for breach of contract claims. Stroll contends that the stat- ute of limitations was tolled as he received a $10,000 personal check from Epstein in May of 1988. accompankd by Epstein 's

ey contend that, because the Government is a party to the lease, interpre- tation of the lease is governed by principles of federal common law, not New York State law. Pursuant to federal common law of con- tracts, Epstein and Fisher continue, the lease between OFM and Epstein contains an im- plied covenant o

ment from Stroll of 5450.000. which Epstein put into oil. In 1984. Stroll asked for his money back: four years later he had received only 510.000. Stroll lost the suit, after Epstein claimed in court, among oth- er things, that the check for 310.000 was for a horse he'd bought from Stroll. -My net w

ly 510.000. Stroll lost the suit, after Epstein claimed in court, among oth- er things, that the check for 310.000 was for a horse he'd bought from Stroll. -My net worth never exceeded four and a half mil- lion dollars." Stroll has stud. Hoffenberg, says a close friend, "really liked Jeffrey.... Jeff

what they knew they. could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger and unrelated pan of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State,. What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of HotTenberg says. "In a crim- inal inve

ment from Stroll of 5450.000. which Epstein put into oil. In 1984. Stroll asked for his money back: four years later he had received only 510.000. Stroll lost the suit. after Epstein claimed in court, among oth- er things, that the check for 510.000 was for a horse he'd bought from Stroll. "My net w

ly 510.000. Stroll lost the suit. after Epstein claimed in court, among oth- er things, that the check for 510.000 was for a horse he'd bought from Stroll. "My net worth never exceeded four and a half mil- lion dollars.' Stroll has said. Page 2829 CONFIDENTIAL Hoffenberg, says a close friend, "reall

ey knew they could get ... and that was the trauduient promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud. based in New York State].... What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says. "In a crim- inal in

awsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics Inc., filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, which Epstein put into oil. In 1984 Stroll asked for his money back; four years later he had received only $10,000. Stroll lost the suit

Electronics Inc., filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, which Epstein put into oil. In 1984 Stroll asked for his money back; four years later he had received only $10,000. Stroll lost the suit, after Epstein claimed in court, among other things, th

nder, but his probation would not be served under the strict requirements of sex offender probation. Jeffrey Epstein is a registered sex offender in New York State and Florida. Emily Michot E//[email protected] The judge didn’t question those provisions, but she did ask why Epstein was going to serve his sen

suit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics -Int, filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, which Epstein put into oil. In 1984, Stroll asked for his money back; four years later he had received only $10,000. Stroll lost the s

tment from Stroll of $450,000, which Epstein put into oil. In 1984, Stroll asked for his money back; four years later he had received only $10,000. Stroll lost the suit, after Epstein claimed in court, among other things, that the check for $10,000 was for a horse he'd bought from Stroll. "My net wort

they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State)... What they couldn't get, they didn't bother with." Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says, "In a criminal inves

ly $10,000. Stroll lost the suit. after Epstein claimed in court, among oth- er things, that the check for $10,000 was for a horse he'd bought from Stroll. "My net worth never exceeded four and a half mil- lion dollars." Stroll has said. Hoffenberg, says a close friend, "really liked Jeffrey.... Jeff

ronics Inc.. filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an in- vestment from Stroll of 5450.000. which Epstein put into oil. In 1984, Stroll asked for his money back: four years later he had received only $10,000. Stroll lost the suit. after Epstein claimed in court, among oth- er thing

ey knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e.. the much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg's fraud, based in New York State].... What they couldn't get. they didn't bother with.- Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of HotTenberg says. "In a crim- inal in

nd unrelated part of Hoffenberg’s fraud, based in New York State].... What they couldn’t get, they didn’t bother w

awsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics Inc., filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, which Epstein put into oil. In 1984 Stroll asked for his money back; four years later he had received only $10,000. Stroll lost the suit