Epstein Secrets

ulent brokers and lawyers. He was also not above entering into risky. tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll. the former head of Wil- liams Electronics Inc., filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an in- vestment from Stroll of 5150.000. w

stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue' of the matter was Marvin David- son. On March 9. Epstein said. he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again. and the two partners ;cid him that the executive com- mittee had weighed the offense. together with previous "carelessness" over expenses. a

ulent brokers and lawyers. He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Wil- liams Electronics Inc.. filed against Epstein shows that in I981 I.A.G. received an in. vestment from Stroll of 5450.000.

stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin David- son. On March 9. Epstein said. he had met with Tarnow/ and Einbender again, and the two punnets told hint that the menthe com- mittee had weighed the offense. together with previous "carelessness- over expenses. and

dulent brokers and lawyers. He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuk that Michael Stroll, the former head of Wil- liams Electronics Inc.. filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an in- vestment from Stroll of 5450.000. w

- stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin David- eon. On March R Epstein said he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the matabet corn- miner had weighed the offense. together with previous "carelessness" over expenses, and

lent brokers and lawyers. lie was also not above entering into risky. tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Wil- liams Electronics Inc.. filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an in- vestment from Stroll of 5450.000. w

stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin David- son. On March 9. Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the tuo partners told him that the executive com- mittee had milted the offense. together with previous "careiessness" over expenses. an

003/03/jeffrey-epstein-200303 He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics Inc., filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, which

n Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an “issue” of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous “carelessness” over expenses, and h

dulent brokers and lawyers. He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller in- vestors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics -Int, filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, whic

Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous "carelessness" over expenses, and

ulent brokers and lawyers. He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Wil- liams Electronics Inc.. filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an in- vestment from Stroll of 5450.000. w

stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin David- son. On March 9. Epstein said. he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive com- mittee had weighed the offense. together with previous "carelessness" over expenses, a

003/03/jeffrey-epstein-200303 He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics Inc., filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, which

n Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an “issue” of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous “carelessness” over expenses, and h