Epstein Secrets

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

ons between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14

al communications between the government and the attorneys for these individuals — including , but not limited to, , David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14. We request

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r