Epstein Secrets

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

t. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We r

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl