Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v. Swanson, 210 F.3d 788, 790 (7th Cir. 2000) ("These elements are hard to prove, and thus Franks hearings are rarely held."). b. Discussion In an alternati
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature ofcell phone location records," which
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v. Swanson, 210 F.3d 788, 790 (7th Cir. 2000) ("These elements are hard to prove, and thus Franks hearings are rarely held."). b. Discussion In an alternati
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v. Swanson, 210 F.3d 788, 790 (7th Cir. 2000) ("These elements are hard to prove, and thus Franks hearings are rarely held."). b. Discussion In an alternati
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v. Swanson, 210 F.3d 788, 790 (7th Cir. 2000) ("These elements are hard to prove, and thus Franks hearings are rarely held."). b. Discussion In an alternati
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Swanson and the Carpenter Court
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON80 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON42 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Chris Tucker
PERSON37 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Colorado
LOCATION36 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
United States
LOCATION35 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON37 w/ Swanson·2 w/ the
Oregon
LOCATION34 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Michael Jackson
PERSON34 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON32 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Michigan
LOCATION32 w/ Swanson·3 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON30 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
George Mitchell
PERSON28 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION28 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON26 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON26 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Stephen Hawking
PERSON25 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
North Carolina
LOCATION23 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Murphy
PERSON22 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Minnesota
LOCATION22 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the
Eric Schmidt
PERSON22 w/ Swanson·4 w/ the