Epstein Secrets

UDGE Bruce A. Green Louis Stein Chair Fordharn University School of Law 150 West 62"d Street Room 7-168 New York City, NY 10023 Dear Professor Green, USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC It: DATE FILED: I September 4, 2019 Thank you for your letter of August 30, 2019. I appreciate yo

alification from representing Ms. Guiffre (in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Tum the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would f

UDGE Bruce A. Green Louis Stein Chair Fordharn University School of Law 150 West 62"d Street Room 7-168 New York City, NY 10023 Dear Professor Green, USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC it: DA.TS SLED: i September 4, 2019 Thank you for your letter of August 30, 2019.1 appreciate yo

ualification from representing Ms.. Lirint(in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Turn the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would

M. BERMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Bruce A. Green Louis Stein Chair Fordham University School of Law New York City, NY 10023 Dear Professor Green, USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 41 411 September 4, 2019 Thank you for your letter of August 30, 2019. I appreciate

Boles' disqualification from representing (in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Turn the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would

ised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's motion is relatively straightforward, and in my view, a public hearing is clearly, nevertheless, the pre

ink that is exactly what the law requires and intends. I will be more blunt than the Court has been, or Professor Cassell has been about Professor Green's article. That is an article that cites no authority, and I believe there is no authority for his proposition. I entirely respect his right to ad