Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
gain a strategic advantage. Here, as in Lovasco, any pre-indictment delay was the result of the Government's continuing investigation of the case. The Lovasco Court held that the investigative delay did not deprive the defendant of his due process rights and noted that imposing a duty upon prosecutors to file c
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
gain a strategic advantage. Here, as in Lovasco, any pre-indictment delay was the result of the Government's continuing investigation of the case. The Lovasco Court held that the investigative delay did not deprive the defendant of his due process rights and noted that imposing a duty upon prosecutors to file c
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
gain a strategic advantage. Here, as in Lovasco, any pre-indictment delay was the result of the Government's continuing investigation of the case. The Lovasco Court held that the investigative delay did not deprive the defendant of his due process rights and noted that imposing a duty upon prosecutors to file c
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
gain a strategic advantage. Here, as in Lovasco, any pre-indictment delay was the result of the Government's continuing investigation of the case. The Lovasco Court held that the investigative delay did not deprive the defendant of his due process rights and noted that imposing a duty upon prosecutors to file c
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (396)
Entities connected to both Patrick Leahy and The Lovasco Court
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON30 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Prince Andrew
PERSON23 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
George W. Bush
PERSON22 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Colorado
LOCATION21 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
United States
LOCATION21 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Julie K. Brown
PERSON20 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON19 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
George Mitchell
PERSON19 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Minnesota
LOCATION19 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Michigan
LOCATION18 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Michael Jackson
PERSON18 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION17 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON16 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Chris Tucker
PERSON15 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON15 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Barneys New York
ORGANIZATION15 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON17 w/ Patrick·3 w/ The
Oregon
LOCATION15 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The
North Carolina
LOCATION14 w/ Patrick·5 w/ The