Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886) 145 Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972) 110 Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209 (1953) 53 Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352 (1973) 181 Bryson v. United States, 396 U.S. 64 (1969) 147 Burgess v. United States, 552 U.S. 124 (2008) 51 C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886) 145 Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972) 110 Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209 (1953) 53 Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352 (1973) 181 Bryson v. United States, 396 U.S. 64 (1969) 147 Burgess v. United States, 552 U.S. 124 (2008) 51 C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886) 145 Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972) 110 Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209 (1953) 53 Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352 (1973) 181 Bryson v. United States, 396 U.S. 64 (1969) 147 Burgess v. United States, 552 U.S. 124 (2008) 51 C
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886) 145 Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972) 110 Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209 (1953) 53 Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352 (1973) 181 Bryson v. United States, 396 U.S. 64 (1969) 147 Burgess v. United States, 552 U.S. 124 (2008) 51 C
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (460)
Entities connected to both Patrick Leahy and Boston
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON30 w/ Patrick·61 w/ Boston
United States
LOCATION21 w/ Patrick·15 w/ Boston
Prince Andrew
PERSON23 w/ Patrick·10 w/ Boston
George W. Bush
PERSON22 w/ Patrick·11 w/ Boston
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Patrick·8 w/ Boston
Colorado
LOCATION21 w/ Patrick·10 w/ Boston
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON15 w/ Patrick·16 w/ Boston
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON14 w/ Patrick·17 w/ Boston
Julie K. Brown
PERSON20 w/ Patrick·9 w/ Boston
Minnesota
LOCATION19 w/ Patrick·10 w/ Boston
George Mitchell
PERSON19 w/ Patrick·10 w/ Boston
Donald Trump
PERSON21 w/ Patrick·8 w/ Boston
Michael Jackson
PERSON18 w/ Patrick·11 w/ Boston
Michigan
LOCATION18 w/ Patrick·10 w/ Boston
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON16 w/ Patrick·12 w/ Boston
Oregon
LOCATION15 w/ Patrick·12 w/ Boston
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON17 w/ Patrick·10 w/ Boston
John F. Kennedy
PERSON11 w/ Patrick·15 w/ Boston
North Carolina
LOCATION14 w/ Patrick·12 w/ Boston
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION17 w/ Patrick·9 w/ Boston