Epstein Secrets

largely ministerial actio=s ? the court also disallowed some of your costs on their own, . in addition only on April 3 in an email to my lawyers, Lance indicated that his fees were only $4,115. =br> Michael, as I said, I would like to resolve this matter, . getting th= facts straight will go a long

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance off=red to accept $150,000. 4. you stated you were operating under the 2005 A=reement? were the invoices addressed to roy? or to jay? was the paym

spirit of resoution, my understanding is that =n response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye you sought and received a currently unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it , your bill

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 4. you stated you were operating under the 2005 Agreement? were the invoices addressed to roy? or to jay? was the pay

spirit of resoution, my understanding is that In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye you sought and received a currently unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it , your bil

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 3 EFTA_R1_01306408 EFTA02341103 4. you stated you were operating under the 2005 Agreement? were the invoices addres

spirit of resoution, my understanding is that In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye you sought and received a currently unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it , your bill

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 4. you stated you were operating under the 2005 Agreement? were the invoices addressed to roy? or to jay? was the paym

spirit of resoution, my understanding is that In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye you sought and received a currently unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it , your bill

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 3 EFTA_R1_01632846 EFTA02503828 4. you stated you were operating under the 2005 Agreement? were the invoices addres

spirit of resoution, my understanding is that In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye you sought and received a currently unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it , your bill

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance off=red to accept $150,000. 4. If you were operating under the 2005 Agreement =were the invoices addressed to roy or to jay? was the pa=ment you re

reement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye on a settlement, yours filed a complaint=20 confidentiality obligations, which was never served on me, an