Epstein Secrets

xth Circuit has held that, when faced with a combination of federal claims and pendent state law claims, federal common law controls under Rule 501. Hancock v. Dodson, 958 F.2d 1367, 1372-73 (6th Cir. 1992) ("Since the instant case is a federal question case by virtue of the appellant's section 1983 clai

has held that, when faced with a combination of federal claims and pendent state law claims, federal common law controls under Rule 501. Hancock v. Dodson, 958 F.2d 1367, 1372-73 (6th Cir. 1992) ("Since the instant case is a federal question case by virtue of the appellant's section 1983 claim, we hold

xth Circuit has held that, when faced with a combination of federal claims and pendent state law claims, federal common law controls under Rule 501. Hancock v. Dodson, 958 F.2d 1367, 1372-73 (6th Cir. 1992) ("Since the instant case is a federal question case by virtue of the appellant's section 1983 clai

has held that, when faced with a combination of federal claims and pendent state law claims, federal common law controls under Rule 501. Hancock v. Dodson, 958 F.2d 1367, 1372-73 (6th Cir. 1992) ("Since the instant case is a federal question case by virtue of the appellant's section 1983 claim, we hold

ate claims and finding that "it also would be impractical to apply two different rules of priv- ilege to the same evideny before a single jury."); Hancock . Dodson, 958 F.2d 1367, 1373 (6 Cir.1992) (holding that the existence of pen- dent state claim did not relieve the Court of its obligation to ap

and finding that "it also would be impractical to apply two different rules of priv- ilege to the same evideny before a single jury."); Hancock . Dodson, 958 F.2d 1367, 1373 (6 Cir.1992) (holding that the existence of pen- dent state claim did not relieve the Court of its obligation to apply the