Epstein Secrets

From: Darren Indyke Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 20:04 To: Claire Brugirard Cc: Larry; Nelson, Michael Subject: Re: BBJ SN 30884 [CC-MERO.FID1S00434] Dear Claire: Thank you for your letter. We appreciate the spirit in which it was written,

haser's advisors. 5. Section 3: We discussed that the aircraft may only be inspected by a facility that is approved by the GCAA. We understand that Stambaugh Aviation is not. It is Royal Jet's preference for the aircraft to be inspected in the UAE at an inspection facility that is approved by the GCAA with an FAA

ou be available for a conference call tomorrow (thursday) morning NYC time in order to discuss a few points? Best Regards, Claire Brugirard From: Nelson, Michael Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 18:34 To: Darren Indyke Cc: Ashok Kumar; Fahad Wali; Claire Brugirard; Husham Osman; Larry; Tebbit, Oli

AA (that is something that Royal Jet would expect the Purchaser to be responsible for). 2. Inspection Facility: The Inspection Facility is named as Stambaugh Aviation in Brunswick, Georgia. Is that facility authorised to inspect and work on UAE registered aircraft? 3. Relocation costs: The Purchaser is to pay for

mics Law Firm of the Year (2016) Global Aviation Law Firm of the Year (2005 - 2015) Best Aviation Finance Advisory - Emerging Markets (2015) From: Nelson, Michael [S] Sent: 22 September 2016 19: To: Darren Indyke Cc: Claire Brugirard; Ashok Kumar; Husham Osman; Larry Subject: RE: 663 SN 30884 [CC-M

haser's advisors. 5. Section 3: We discussed that the aircraft may only be inspected by a facility that is approved by the GCAA. We understand that Stambaugh Aviation is not. It is Royal Jet's preference for the aircraft to be inspected in the UAE at an inspection facility that is approved by the GCAA with an FAA