Epstein Secrets

is post -does.. He knows for certain that he has never met you, nor does he know of your work On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Al seckel < wrote: Kossyln and i were in correspondence, and he was particularly interested in a case involving a unique patient that I discovered who had no mind's eye and no

saoc ---- From: Al seael To: Christof Koch Sent: Tue, March, Subject: declaration Christof, It is perfectly acceptable, and it should be on your Caltech letterhead and then it needs to be notarized. Hopefully, this will end this horror. This document will not be used for any other purpose than as a

and my work product, I can gladly supply them. I am just worried about the register's office, as they may give a similar off putting response like Kosslyn did, because I never went in there after the case was settled, to clear it up. That libel case went on for about 2 years. BTW, he wrote to both Cal

. This will be reflected in the Court documents. You can forward them Christofs sworn declaration and the other declarations, I sent you today. The Caltech ID and Feynman thing is ok too. The rest of the libel/slander case, details, depositions, testimony, transcripts, etc., were sealed at the close of

0 PM, Al seckel wrote: Well, his work on spatial imagery is great, but his own memory is pretty flawed. Oh well.... I have the correspondence from Kosslyn PRIOR to McIver writing him, where he was very interested in the case, and wanted to pursue it jointly. I was also corresponding with a post-doe in

seckel To: Christof Koch Sent: Tue, March 4, 2008 4:22:34 PM Subject: dedaration Christof, It is perfectly acceptable, and it should be on your Caltech letterhead and then it needs to be notarized. Hopefully, this will end this horror. This document will not be used for any other purpose than as a

om" Subject: Re: this morning.... Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 00:43:20 +0000 I am a friend. Christpohs letter suggested that Al had a relationship with Kosslyn. Kosslyn said he does not know Al ,they never had any realtion he does not know his work, does not want al suggesting in any way whatsoever that he

is, and they started discussing the patient with the goal of writing up a paper about it. Al posted what he was working on in this regard on his own Caltech web page, which was standard practice at the time. McIver saw this posting, and then wrote blasting emails to Kosslyn about AI, and the whole projec

n access to them, and I am contacting my attorney first thing on Monday, as that is a very serious legal breach. I don't know what the bug is with Kosslyn. Christof and I have the correspondence with him. The correspondence doesn't lie. I can't help it if he can't remember. Just makes him the one with

To: Jeffrey [email protected]] From: Al seckel Sent: Sat 11/27/2010 3:03:55 PM Subject: Further Christof and I will go down to the Caltech register's office and straighten this out. It is not right, and I did go through a process, where I was approved by the faculty, before I got that

To: Jeffrey [email protected]] From: Al seckel Sent: Fri 11/26/2010 10:52:29 PM Subject: Re: declaration Kossyln and i were in correspondence, and he was particularly interested in a case involving a unique patient that I discovered who had no mind's eye and no

To: Christof Koc Sent: Tue, March 4, 2008 4:22:34 PM Subject: declaration Christof, wrote: It is perfectly acceptable, and it should be on your Caltech letterhead and then it needs to be notarized. Hopefully, this will end this horror. This document will not be used for any other purpose than as a

and my work product, I can gladly supply them. I am just worried about the register's office, as they may give a similar off putting response like Kosslyn did, because I never went in there after the case was settled, to clear it up. That libel case went on for about 2 years. EFTA_R1_01481802 EFTA024

This will be reflected in the Court documents. You can forward them Christofs sworn declaration and the other declarations, I sent you today. The Caltech ID and Feynman thing is ok too. The rest of the libel/slander case, details, depositions, testimony, transcripts, etc., were sealed at the close of

and my work product, I can gladly supply them. I am just worried about the register's office, as they may give a similar off putting response like Kosslyn did, because I never went in there after the case was settled, to clear it up. That libel case went on for about 2 years. BTW, he wrote to both Cal

This will be reflected in the Court documents. You can forward them Christofs sworn declaration and the other declarations, I sent you today. The Caltech ID and Feynman thing is ok too. The rest of the libel/slander case, details, depositions, testimony, transcripts, etc., were sealed at the close of

To: Al seckel From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Fri 11/26/2010 10:45:22 PM Subject Re: declaration AL„ I just spoke to Kosslyn said he does not know you. he may have received an email, and thought you might , only might have corresponded with a post doc of his nothing more,

age ---- From: Al seckel To: Christof Koch Sent: Tue, March, Subject: declaration Christof, It is perfectly acceptable, and it should be on your Caltech letterhead and then it needs to be notarized. Hopefully, this will end this horror. This document will not be used for any other purpose than as a

and my work product, I can gladly supply them. I am just worried about the register's office, as they may give a similar off putting response like Kosslyn did, because I never went in there after the case was settled, to clear it up. That libel case went on for about 2 years. BTW, he wrote to both Cal

This will be reflected in the Court documents. You can forward them Christofs sworn declaration and the other declarations, I sent you today. The Caltech ID and Feynman thing is ok too. The rest of the libel/slander case, details, depositions, testimony, transcripts, etc., were sealed at the close of