Epstein Secrets

, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006), opinion reinstated by, 144 Fed. Appx. 804 (2005); United States v. Ortega, 363 F.3d 1093 (11h Cir. 2004); United States v. Miranda, 348 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2003); United States v. Tillman 195 F.3d 640 (11th Cir. 1999); United States v.Panfil, 338 F.3d 1299 (11° Cir. 2003); Uni

d 1299 (11° Cir. 2003); United States v. Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 1999); gintosovvsisto, 175 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 1999); United. States v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005); United States v. Root 296 F. 3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002). What all of these cases have in common is that the defe

tutionalitS, of 2422(b) & his sentence. Court affirmed both conviction & sentence. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. v. Miranda, 348 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2003) Internet Internet chat room; conversations about having sex with "13 yr-old"; arranged to meet for sex; arreste

months. Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated & remanded because of Booker error. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was internet communica

titutionality of 2422(b) & his sentence. Court affirmed both conviction & sentence. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. v. Miranda, 348 F.3d 1322 (11' Cir. 2003) Internet Internet chat room; conversations about having sex with "13 yr-old"; arranged to meet for sex; arrested

nsummated Showed up for meeting Stint, Sentenced to 78 months. Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated & remanded because of Booker error. U.S. v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (1 1th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was intemet communica

. 2004),judgment vacated for Booker consideration, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006); United States v. Orrega, 363 F.3d 1093 (11th Cir. 2004); United States v. Miranda, 348 F.3d 1322 (I 1* Cir. 2003); United States v. Tillmon, 195 F.3d 640 (I I* Cir. 1999); United States v. Poe!, supra, 338 F.3d 1299 (11* Cir. 200

(11* Cir. 2003); United States v. Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 (11° Cir. 1999); United States v. Burgess, 175 F.3d 1261 (II* Cir. 1999); United States v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (I I° Cir. 2005); United States v. Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11* Cir. 2002). United States v. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283 (11* Cir. 2004)

r. 2004),judgment varied for Booker consideration, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006); United States v. Orrega, 363 F.3d 1093 (11th Cir. 2004); United States v. Miranda, 348 F.3d 1322 (11° Cir. 2003); United States v. Tillmon, 195 F.3d 640 (11th Cir. 1999); United States v. Panfll, supra, 338 F.3d 1299 (11° Cir. 20

9 (11° Cir. 2003); United States it Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 (11° Cir. 1999); United States v. Burgess,175 F.3d 1261 (11° Cir. 1999); United States v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11° Cir. 2005); United States it Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002). United States it Murrell, 368 F3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2004)

stitutionality of 2422(b) & his sentence. Court affirmed both conviction & sentence. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. I Miranda, 348 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2003) Internet Sting Internet chat room; conversations about having sex with "13 yr-old"; arranged to meet for sex;

5,000 fine, $86 restitution & $300 special assessment. Affirmed. 57 EFTA00226339 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION. CIIARGE.S U.S. I Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was internet communica